NEWS
N69bn alleged fraud: Chief Judge transfers Fayose’s trial to another
judge
The Chief Judge (CJ)
of the Federal High Court on Friday transferred the trial of the former
Governor of Ekiti State, Ayodele Fayose, charged with alleged N6.9 billion
fraud, to a new judge.
The CJ, Justice
Adamu Abdu-Kafarati, transferred the case from the former judge, Justice
Mojisola Olatoregun, to Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke.
The action,
followed a petition by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC),
seeking a transfer of the case.
Fayose was
arraigned on Oct. 22, 2018, by the EFCC, alongside a company, Spotless
Investment Ltd, on 11 counts bordering on fraud and money laundering offence.
He had pleaded not
guilty to the charge and was granted bail on Oct. 24, 2018, in the sum of N50
million with sureties in like sum, while the prosecution opened trial on Nov.
19, and had so far called 13 witnesses out of 15 listed.
On March 20, a
drama ensued in court midway into the trial, between the trial judge, and EFCC
counsel, Mr Rotimi Jacobs, SAN.
The judge raised
concerns on the manner of prosecution by counsel, and had noted that the
prosecutor was not doing a good job, adding that he was not competent to
evaluate the court’s ruling.
On his part, the
prosecutor expressed his displeasure on the grounds that he had always
dispensed his duties diligently and had never been derogated by any court.
Meanwhile, at the
last proceedings on May 10, the 13th prosecution witness, Mr Adewale
Aladegbola, a former driver of a bullion van, had given evidences which the
prosecutor described as being contrary to his extrajudicial statement to the
commission.
On this premise,
the prosecutor informed the court that his witness appeared “hostile” and urged
the court to adjourn the case to enable him make necessary application on the
situation.
Continuation of
trial was billed to resume on June 10.
However, the CJ
conveyed the transfer of the case from Justice Olatoregun to Justice Aneke, by
a letter dated May 23, a copy of which was obtained by newsmen,NAN reports.
The CJ said: “I
refer to the petition of EFCC on this case and your Lordship’s comments
thereto.
“It is apparent
that the prosecution has lost confidence in the judge trying this case and
justice must not only be done but must be seen to have been done, I hereby
transfer this case to Hon. Justice C. J. Aneke for hearing.”
A new date for the
case before Aneke has however not been confirmed.
The matter will
consequently begin afresh before the new judge, as the defendant will take his
plea again.
During the trial
before Olatoregun, the prosecution had called witnesses, from Zenith Bank,
Diamond Bank, as well as a former Minister of State for Defence, Sen. Musiliu
Obanikoro.
According to the
charge, on June 17, 2014, Fayose and Agbele were said to have taken possession
of the sum of N1.2 billion, for purposes of funding his gubernatorial election
campaign in Ekiti State, which sum they reasonably ought to have known formed
part of crime proceeds.
Fayose was alleged
to have received a cash payment of five million dollars, (about N1.8 billion)
from the then Minister of State for Defence, Sen. Musiliu Obanikoro, without
going through any financial institution and which sum exceeded the amount
allowed by law.
He was also alleged
to have retained the sum of N300 million in his Zenith Bank account and took
control of the aggregate sums of about N622 million which sum he ought to have
known formed part of crime proceeds.
Fayose was alleged
to have procured De Privateer Ltd and Still Earth Ltd, to retain in their
Zenith and FCMB accounts, the aggregate sums of N851 million which they
reasonably ought to have known formed part of crime proceeds.
Besides, the
accused was alleged to have used about N1.6 billion to acquire properties in
Lagos and Abuja, which he reasonably ought to have known formed part of crime
proceeds.
The accused was
also alleged to have used the sum of N200 million, to acquire a property in
Abuja, in the name of his elder sister, Moji Oladeji, which sum he ought to
know also forms crime proceeds.
The offence
contravened the provisions of sections 15(1), 15 (2), 15 (3), 16(2)(b), 16 (d),
and 18 (c) of the Money Laundering Prohibition Act 2011.
SHARE THIS STORY
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your comment, keep reading our news and articles